To reach us at any time, call our toll free number: 1-877-602-9900

  • MacLean Family Law Group - Vancouver

  • Suite 3103 - 1077 West Cordova Street
  • Vancouver, BC
  • V6C 2C6
  • Tel: 604-602-9000
  • Fax: 604-682-0556
  • MacLean Family Law Group - Fort St. John

  • 9503 100th Avenue
  • Fort St. John, BC
  • V1J 4N4
  • Tel: 250-262-5052
  • Fax: 250-262-5053
  • Search BC Family Law

Posts Tagged ‘BC child access’

BC High Conflict Child Custody Parental Alienation- Levels of Alienation

Saturday, February 19th, 2011

Lorne MacLean, BC Child Custody Lawyer, in Victoria BC handling a parental alienation case


Lorne MacLean and Ari Wormeli are just finishing week 4 of a highly contested BC parental alienation and or estrangement case. These cases require a tremendous amount of work to uncover which aspect and or parent is causing the children to ally with one against visiting the other parent. Such cases are heartbreaking below we set out what types of alienation can exist as well as what types of alienating parents may be involved.

LEVELS OF SEVERITY OF PA

When parental alienation is mild, the child resists contact with the alienated parent, but enjoys his relationship with that parent once parenting time is underway. The child may have a strong, healthy relationship with both parents, even though the child recites criticisms of the alienated parent.

When parental alienation reaches a moderate degree of severity, the child strongly resists contact and is persistently oppositional during parenting time with the alienated parent. The child is likely to have a mildly to moderately pathological relationship with the preferred parent.

When parental alienation is at a severe degree of intensity, the child strongly and persistently resists contact and may hide or run away to avoid seeing the alienated parent. The child’s behavior is driven by a firmly held, false belief that the alienated parent is evil, dangerous, or worthless. The child is likely to have a strong, severely pathological relationship with the preferred parent, perhaps sharing a paranoid worldview.

What are the levels of intensity of alienating behavior?
 
In his book, Divorce Casualties: Protecting Your Children from Parental Alienation, Douglas Darnall (1998) proposed a three-tier classification system, now in common use, that distinguishes between naïve, active and obsessed alienators:

Naïve alienators make negative comments about the other parent but without serious intent to undermine the child’s relationship with that parent. Their negative comments tend to be careless remarks, and, in general, naïve alienators support the child’s relationship with the other parent.
 
Active alienators are more consistent and determined in their alienating behaviors. There is an intentional desire to criticize and undermine the targeted parent. Deep down, however, active alienators realize that what they are doing is wrong and potentially harmful to the child.

Obsessed alienators are determined to destroy the child’s relationship with the targeted parent. Obsessed alienators are extremists. They pressure the child to adopt their own negative view of the targeted parent, put much pressure on the child to emphatically reject the targeted parent, and cannot tolerate a good relationship between the child and the targeted parent.

What are the recommended treatments for parental alienation?
 
When parental alienation is properly recognized, that condition is preventable and treatable in many instances. The appropriate treatment is determined partly by the severity of the parental alienation manifested by the child and partly by the intensity of the alienating behaviors manifested by the alienating parent.
 
If the parental alienation is mild, the treatment can be accomplished by a parenting coordinator who helps the parents communicate in a constructive manner and gives them specific advice regarding their approach to the child’s activities with the alienated parent.
 
If the parental alienation is moderate, the treatment typically includes more intensive therapy for the child, mother, and father, as well as meetings with the parenting coordinator. If there are multiple therapists involved with the divorced family, they must agree regarding the nature of the problem and the goals of the treatment (Darnall, 2010).

If the parental alienation is severe, traditional forms of psychotherapy may not be effective. As time goes on, children with parental alienation become intractable in their false beliefs and their mental condition resembles that of individuals with delusional disorder. If the parental alienation is severe, it has usually been induced by an obsessed, alienating parent. Also, in some cases of moderate parental alienation, the cause of the condition is an obsessed, alienating parent. In both moderate and severe cases of parental alienation – when it is caused by an obsessed, alienating parent – it is necessary to greatly reduce or even eliminate the child’s exposure to that parent. See Gardner (2001), Darnall (2010), Warshak (2001, 2010), and Warshak and Otis (2010).
 
In such cases – when the parental alienation has been caused by an obsessed, alienating parent – it is necessary to transfer the children’s custody from the alienating parent to the custody of the alienated parent or perhaps to the temporary custody of a neutral caregiver. Once the child has been removed from the influence of the alienating parent, it is possible to help the child re-establish a comfortable, healthy relationship with the alienated parent. After that has occurred, it should be possible to allow contact gradually with the alienating parent, although that parenting time may need to be supervised. The ultimate goal is for the child to have a good relationship with both parents.

BC CHILD CUSTODY AND BC CHILD ACCESS TO BE RENAMED BC CHILD PARENTING TIME AND BC CHILD CONTACT

Thursday, October 14th, 2010

Lorne MacLean BC Child Custody Lawyer Discusses BC Child Custody Changes

Probably the most difficult issue BC separated parents must face is how to settle BC child custody, BC child Guardianship and BC child access. Some have argued for a presumption of joint and shared BC child custody as the new default position. I have argued we divide property equally, we try to equalize standards of living by payment of support but if someone asks to share custody after separation it is frequently dismissed as unworkable. I respond that children do not forfeit the love and guidance of two caring and concerned parents merely because of marriage breakdown. The BC government’s Family Relations Act Reform White Paper contains important new terminology and strategies to deal with children in separated families. I had the honour of arguing Canada’s key child custody and guardianship case in the Supreme Court of Canada in Young v. Young and one of my arguments was that parents do not have rights- rather they have responsibilities. I am heartened to see this concept has been adopted by the BC government.

The proposed Act provides a list of “parental responsibilities” that guardians must exercise in the best interests of their children. This list is modelled largely on section 18(6) of Alberta’s Family Law Act.

Upon separation, the starting point is that each guardian may exercise all of the parental responsibilities. Parental responsibilities may be allocated between guardians by agreement or court order, but if there is no allocation, each guardian retains responsibility for all aspects of the care of their children
This approach is intended to encourage greater co-operation by giving guardians a clear idea of what their responsibilities are and allowing parenting arrangements to be tailored to each family’s circumstances. However, where co-operation is not possible or appropriate, the option of asking a judge to make an order allocating parental responsibilities in the child’s best interests is available. If there is an ongoing risk of family violence, a parent may seek a protection order. See Chapter 4: Children’s Best Interests and Chapter 12: Protection Orders for further details.
One of the parental responsibilities that may be allocated is “to make day-to-day decisions affecting the child, including having the day-to-day care and control of the child and supervising the child’s daily activities.” A guardian’s “parenting time” is the time during which he or she exercises this responsibility.
A non-guardian’s time with a child (“contact”) may be in the form of visits or any other method of communication including oral or written communication. Since only guardians have parental responsibilities, there are no parental responsibilities associated with contact. If a written agreement respecting contact is to be made, all guardians who have the parental responsibility to decide with whom the child is to associate must sign the agreement. Anyone may apply to a court for an order for contact and the court may include any terms in the order that it considers appropriate.

Parental responsibilities

46 (1) Subject to an agreement or court order that allocates parental responsibilities, a guardian
may exercise the following parental responsibilities with respect to the child:
(a) to make day-to-day decisions affecting the child, including having the day-to-day care and control of the child and supervising the child’s daily activities;
(b) to decide the child’s place of residence and to change the child’s place of residence;
(c) to make decisions about the child’s education, including the nature, extent and place of the education and the child’s participation in extracurricular school activities;
(d) to make decisions regarding the child’s cultural, linguistic, religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage;
(e) to decide with whom the child is to live and with whom the child is to associate;
(f) to decide whether the child should work and, if so, the nature and extent of the work, for whom the work is to be done and other related matters;
(g) to consent to medical, dental and other health-related treatment for the child subject to section 17 of the Infants Act;
(h) to grant or refuse consent if consent of a parent or guardian is required by law;
(i) to receive and respond to any notice that a parent or guardian is entitled or required by law to receive;
(j) subject to any applicable legislation, to commence, defend, compromise or settle legal proceedings relating to the child and to compromise or settle proceedings taken against the child;
White Paper on Family Relations Act Reform 2010
(k) subject to any applicable provincial legislation, to identify, advance and protect the legal and financial interest of the child not referred to in paragraph (j);
(l) to authorize a person to exercise, on a temporary basis, the guardian’s parental responsibilities, other than those referred to in subsections (b), (d), (j) and (k) on behalf of the guardian if the guardian is temporarily unable to exercise those responsibilities;
(m) to receive from third parties health, education or other information that may significantly affect the child;
(n) to exercise any other responsibilities reasonably necessary to nurture the child’s physical, psychological and emotional development and to guide the child toward independent adulthood.
(2) A guardian of a child must exercise his or her parental responsibilities in the best interests of the child.

If you have a difficult child custody case call us toll free at 1-877-602-9900.

BC PARENTING COORDINATION and COORDINATOR UPDATE

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Shelagh Kinney Family Mediator Vancouver and Fort St John BC

BC Parenting Coordination in British Columbia child custody cases is an emerging alternative BC family law dispute resolution process in which a BC lawyer or British Columbia mental health professional with BC mediation training and experience assists BC parents to implement their parenting plan by facilitating the resolution of their disputes in a timely manner, educating parents about children’s needs and, with prior approval of the parties and/or the court, making decisions within the scope of the court order or appointment contract.

BC Parenting coordination may be of assistance in “high conflict” cases dealing with BC child custody related issues where parents have demonstrated a chronic inability to resolve conflicts about the children and bring frequent contested court applications regarding BC parenting issues.

Parenting coordination is not therapy or counseling for any family member, nor a formal custody evaluation or assessment. Although the Parenting Coordinator (“PC”) may act as a mediator to try to assist the parents to reach agreement on issues, parenting coordination is not only mediation as the PC will also have the ability to make certain decisions if the parties do not agree. The PC is appointed for a defined term, and the fees for the PCs services will be allocated between the parents by agreement or order.

Some examples of parental disputes settled by a PC include:

1. parenting time schedules, including regular access, holidays and vacations, temporary variations for special events, travel and passport arrangements;

2. a child’s recreational activities;

3. education (tutoring, summer school, school choice) or daycare;

4. health care (medical/dental);

5. child rearing issues ( bedtimes, alterations of the child’s appearance such as haircuts and piercings);

6. sharing of special or extraordinary expenses for the children; and

7. forms of communications between parents, including monitoring of emails and other correspondence by the PC if these have been an issue.

Parenting coordination is relatively new in British Columbia. In the United States, several states have statutes authorizing the appointment of PCs, including Oregon, California, Texas, and, most recently, Florida. Although there is currently no statutory authority in British Columbia governing parenting coordination, there have been several reported cases in which PCs have been appointed by a Judge of the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

For the past few years, a group of British Columbia family law lawyers and mental health professionals have been working towards establishing parenting coordination as a new legal mechanism in BC to deal with the unique issues facing high-conflict parents, including providing a roster of PCs under the BC Parenting Coordinators Roster Society.

Lorne MacLean recently defined the rules in BC Supreme Court that should apply to the terms of a parenting coordination contract and you should be aware of what the parenting coordinator can and cannot do. MacLean also warns you need to ensure the Court does not abdicate its’ duty to protect children and not allow one parent to keep the fight over children alive through PC involvement.

If you have any questions on Parenting Coordination please call Shelagh Kinney, family mediator of our offices at 604-602-9000 who has taken the Parenting Coordinator training and courses related to this area from Joan Kelly as well as arbitration training.

SMART BC DIVORCE TIPS VIDEO # 4 WINNING YOUR BC CHILD CUSTODY CASE RELEASED

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Lorne MacLean, BC child custody lawyer and high net worth BC divorce and BC family law lawyer gives out great free video tips on how to win your British Columbia child custody case. If you are involved in a British Columbia divorce and child custody, guardianship, or BC child access case these tips are critical to helping you win your case. Follow this advice immediately and increase your chances of success in your BC Child custody and BC Guardianship and access case.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO NOW

BC CHILD CUSTODY AND HIGH CONFLICT BRITISH COLUMBIA GUARDIANSHIP AND CHILD ACCESS-PARENTING COORDINATORS

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

p1000685
Image Lorne MacLean BC Family Lawyer on Brooklyn Bridge New York

British Columbia parents involved in divorce and child custody disputes often disagree on what a fair child custody, guardianship and access arrangement should be. Our website contains an explanation of the different child custody arrangemeents that a court may order. While all BC marriage breakdowns are stressful some cases go beyond normal stress and levels of conflict reach the toxic stage where no cooperation between parents becomes possible. Some experts and judges have championed the concept of using a third party, called a parenting coordinator, to decide custody, guardianship and access issues. The concern I have is that using this approach parents are really ceding their rights to a stranger and the argument can be made that the courts in Canada have no jurisdiction to give child custody and guardianship powers to a stranger no matter how briefly they are involved to make a decision on a disputed child care issues.

A recent Wall Street Journal article summarizes the current US approach-
(more…)


MacLean Family Law Group Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).